floating facebook button arrow left side

Uneducated Opinion

The Return of Blizzard

By Mike - April 19, 2010

nakedrobber heart explodes The Return of Blizzard

nakedrobber blizzard timeline The Return of Blizzard

I honestly believe that the greatest era for video games dawned in 1994 and ended in 2003. During that nine year period we saw the arrival of the best developer on earth, Blizzard Entertainment, release five ground breaking titles. All but their first game, Warcraft: Orcs and Humans, were followed up with a solid expansion to generate a near endless amount of high quality gameplay. Everywhere, regrettably unaborted nerds rejoiced.

Blizzard blazed the trail for real-time strategy games with Warcraft and Starcraft and revolutionized the action-RPG genre with Diablo. On average we were treated to new content once a year that stood above the competition in terms of quality and gameplay for nearly a decade.

But then something strange happened in 2004 and I’m not referring to the time I woke up after a night of drinking and was spooning with my buddy while Star Trek porn was playing on my tv but it was equally as disturbing. Blizzard went in a completely new direction and tackled the MMORPG market with World of Warcraft. I’ll be the first to admit that it sounded pretty rad in the beginning but today I can proudly say that I’ve never once touched the toxic game after witnessing friends and co-workers talk about it like a filthy crack addiction.

WoW hit like the Black Plague and turned everyone’s minds into Jello pudding, which is probably the closest thing we’ve seen to the zombie epidemic I’ve anxiously been waiting for (I glance at the loaded shotgun mounted on my wall). As enticing as it is to be an irritable bag of subsisting meat hunched over a keyboard, I’ve managed to resist the temptation of ruining my life and having my parents cross my name off the family tree. I prefer to play my games in smaller, controlled doses during my spare time rather than going on epic binges that would leave me unemployed and questioning whether its June or October.

No one can really blame Blizzard because World of Warcraft has been by far their most profitable title to date, but its come at the price of turning half our population into ugly, brain dead slugs. Another lucrative market is brewing methamphetamine in your bathtub and selling it to high school kids, but it isn’t necessarily an admirable decision.

Worst of all, World of Warcraft has clogged the production of Blizzards original titles worse than a large cheese pizza crammed into Kevin Smith’s colon. After experiencing so many great titles for nine years we were suddenly cut off as they started catering to some of the saddest, weak willed people on the planet with this big chat room where you hang out, play dress up and throw shrieking temper tantrums when the server is down. The majority of WoW players were barely even born when the rest of us were buying Warcraft II: The Tides of Darkness off the shelf and playing it on our 486. Now we have to sit and watch while the name ‘Warcraft’ is defiled worse than the chicks in “Two Girls, One Cup”.

I can’t help but notice that with the arrival of WoW was also the demise of PC gaming. Granted, the stiff competition between Microsoft and Sony pushed consoles to much higher levels ultimately crowding the PC’s market but the fact that Blizzard put their previous titles on the back burner for over seven years in exchange for the ultra low-poly World of Warcraft was lights out. I’m pretty sure I could run The Wrath of the Lich King on my Grandmas computer that she bought at the flea market. There hasn’t been a single must-have PC game raising the bar for processor/video requirements in quite a long time. Sure there’s been a handful of mundane 3D shooters, but seriously…I’d rather get my head shots laying on a couch with a controller and a 52″ HD tv.

Hell, it’s been 13 years since we’ve seen a Starcraft title and 10 years since the last Diablo. Games like these were generally untouchable to the consoles of the time and were some of the best reasons to invest in a PC but since Warcraft III there hasn’t really been anything new that has stood out that isn’t on Xbox or Playstation. Now any games that do make it to Windows are generally developed for consoles first and ported over as an after thought. I’m really not complaining either, it took years of kicking and screaming like a hobo with his leg caught in a bear trap before I finally buckled and bought a PS3 and I never really looked back.

Now, many years later, with the soon arriving Starcraft II and Diablo III coming for the PC, I seem to have mixed feelings about the return of the prodigal son. I let my old computer fade away into ruin quite a while ago, and replaced it with a decent laptop since I don’t really have much need for a good tower. I can honestly say that if there was ever a good reason to upgrade your computer it would be for one of these two games, surely.

Has anyone told Blizzard that most people don’t really play PC games anymore? Other than disgusting WoW players of course, but I consider that more of a nasty habit than a gaming experience.

avatar mike article The Return of Blizzard

Share this: Twitter | StumbleUpon | Facebook | Delicious | digg

You may also hate:

Starcraft 2 is good but quit fondling the box
Times Have Changed
The Lost Art of the Coop RPG
Does Pirating Games Affect You?
Effed in the Eight

  • Mike

    I’m with you man, there’s been an unnecessary lull in production. I find that Starcraft was a solid enough game that some simple updates warrant a sequel, but yea….13 years? Christ sake.

    Diablo 3 looks great, and I’m so happy they stuck with the classic 3/4 view. All the gameplay videos I’ve seen tells me it will be worth the wait.

  • http://www.darktidetees.com WarJester

    I agree 110%, I am in SC2 beta and let me tell you, this game FEELS like it should have been released a year or two after SC… I seriously play that fucker and think… 13 years FOR THIS!?!?! Its the SAME FUCKING GAME! Just a few new units and updated graphics… Its the same as WC1 vs WC2… the same differences… its certainly no drastic change like WC3 vs its predecessors. Dont get me wrong, I am happy its coming out FINALLY but shit… they couldn’t have thrown this together 10 years ago?

    I hope D3 is as good as the hype.

  • Mike

    It’s not like Sierra*, Fallout’s creator, botched Fallout 3.

    It was Betheseda who dug Fallout from the graveyard, breathed life into it and then proceeded to rape it in the ass. They really owed nothing to Fallout fans, and realistically for them to deliver the best possible result would be to stick with what they know: 1st person RPG games.

    It’s hard to criticize them for anything because if it wasn’t for them there would be no Fallout 3 or any future Fallout games to look forward to.

    All in all, the game was quite good for what it was: FPS Fallout.

    *I meant Interplay, apologies.

    • http://www.nakedrobber.com Alan

      This is getting off topic, but Bethsada licensed the rights to use the Fallout IP from interplay, but if they didn’t I’m positive that numerous other companies would have attempted to and may have stayed true to the original style.

      As well, Interplay itself is working to develop a Fallout MMORPG so Bethsada didn’t save the series from the graveyard at all.

      I agree that Fallout was a decent FPS, but it’s still a shame they weren’t able to deliver a title as fantastic as the original games. I totally think that Bethsada should owe the fans, that’s why they purchase the IP in the first place. If they didn’t care about appealing to an existing fan base then why not just invest that money into making a new franchise? It would have saved them 5 mil.

      It’s the exact same thing 2k is doing to XCOM, which is why I used Fallout 3 as an example. Sucks when it happens to franchises you like.

  • http://www.nakedrobber.com Alan

    Well… in that regard Fallout 3 wasn’t exactly what I wanted.

    “Hey, let’s remake Fallout, but this time take out all the humor and all the fun science fiction and geek culture references. Then make it a first person shooter! Oh, and replace the diverse array of towns with one giant free roaming desert spotted with the same rabid dog every 20 km. And instead of getting a car you can get NOTHING. And then for fun we’ll make the party system horrible and pointless. But we’ll bring the enclave back so that should shut those nerds up.”

  • Mike

    To think that a giant game developer like 2K has some of your cherished childhood memories in the palm of their hand. Don’t be too brokenhearted when they crush them into a fine powder.

  • DoctorSnuggles

    No Fucking Kidding.

    Considering Warcraft 3 was the fastest selling PC game of it’s time, and received a 92 on Metacritic, you have to wonder WTF they’re thinking over there at Blizzard.

    Oh, so you’re too busy with WOW? Then expand your studio, hire more people, and make even more money. I can even give you a list of a hundred talented people willing to quit their current gaming jobs effective immediately in order to work on Warcraft 4.

    Perhaps more regrettably is the fact that Blizzard is losing it’s roots. Lest we forget the games that gave rise to WOW. Without the first 3 Warcraft games, WOW would not have had the rich history and mythos to build from, not to mention the fan base.

    That being said, I’m stoked to see the new Starcraft and Diablo games coming out, they’re far over due. And if you think those will sell well, which they will, how well do you think a new RTS Warcraft would sell considering the existing fanbase plus the 11 million plus people ruining their chances of ever getting laid?

    And please 2K… Don’t ruin XCOM.

  • GoMAD!

    Can’t wait for Diablo III! I agree, it’s so annoying that WoW took over Blizzard. You’d think with the extra billion dollars Wow made that they could have hired 1 or 2 more artists to finish Diablo 3.